Re: joining a working group

For web api development I prefer an open mailing list and discussion forum
where all work gets done very little if any in member confidential area,
similar to WebApps WG WHATWG, etc. This allows independent web developers
and browser vendors to freely participate and push the API design forward.

Cheers
Satish


On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>wrote:

> Can you clarify what the problem is?  The MMI WG has always published
> frequent working drafts, so it keeps the public informed of what it is
> doing well before a work item reaches standard status.  The only things
> that are private are the discussions leading up to the working draft.
>
> Is the concern about member confidentiality based on IP issues, or what?
>
>
> - Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olli Pettay [mailto:Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi]
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 7:43 AM
> To: Arthur Barstow
> Cc: public-speech-api@w3.org
> Subject: Re: joining a working group
>
> On 08/24/2012 04:37 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> >  >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-speech-api/2012Aug/0083.htm
> > l  > From: Young, Milan <Milan.Young@nuance.com>  > Both the title and
>
> > charter of the Multimodal Interaction WG group seems  > to be a
> > perfect home for this effort.
> >
> >
> > It appears to me (e.g. see [1]) the MMI WG still does all of its
> > technical work in Member confidential space. As such, perhaps that
> constraint would be show-stopper for some potential participants.
>
> Indeed that would be.
>
>
> -Olli
>
>
>
> >
> > -AB
> >
> > [1] <http://www.w3.org/2011/03/mmi-charter.html> "Proceedings are
> Member-only"
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>