- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:50:07 +0100
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
On 17/04/2019 10:32, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 16/04/2019 16:45, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> [It looks like I am no longer a member of the group and not receiving >> emails >> so this response is not linked to the initial message.] >> >> If the draft is to be published there should be a disclaimer that the >> proposals have not gone through independent review. >> >> peter >> > > The publication would just be descriptions. No mention of independent > review. > > """ > This document identifies problems with SPARQL EXISTS and describes two > proposals. > """ A CG report does not go through a Working Draft process like a WG REC does, if that is your concern. > > Andy
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 09:50:35 UTC