- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:38:15 +0100
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
The draft document
https://w3c.github.io/sparql-exists/docs/sparql-exists.html
contains useful material such as an analysis of the situation.
We do not have agreement on a single solution but it is useful to record
the two possibilities.
So I suggest publishing a completely neutral document of identified
issues and the two possible ways forward without judgement.
Andy
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2019 13:38:39 UTC