Re: updated draft

good evening;

> On 2017-04-02, at 21:04, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> […]
> 
> There is no reading of https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ that can result
> in anything else, even though the end result is counter-intuitive.

> 
> 
> There is then the question of what should happen.  However, that is a
> different question from the question of what the definition of SPARQL in
> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/ says does happen.


as i wrote, you misconstrue.

best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com

Received on Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:18:46 UTC