- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:51:45 +0000
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 12:52:16 UTC
good afternoon; > On 2016-09-27, at 14:13, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > > It appears that the SPARQL implementation that you are using is somehow losing > the binding for ?MDxReport_B. As far as I can tell, this is a bug in the > implementation and not a problem with the SPARQL specification. Therefore > this is not in scope for the CG. that the query appears to demonstrate a deficiency in an established sparql processor for a particular combination of filters, exists, and variable references, suggests that it would be valuable to reduce the query and the dataset to the minimum case which demonstrates the deficiency, record the correct result, and include the case in the test suite. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Tuesday, 27 September 2016 12:52:16 UTC