- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 21:18:06 +0000
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
- Message-ID: <01020155c213349e-615f0cdc-4cc2-4ad2-bd9c-c5a44eda7877-000000@eu-west-1.amazonse>
good evening; > On 2016-07-06, at 19:33, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: > > On 06/07/16 17:40, james anderson wrote: >> >>> On 2016-07-06, at 18:22, Peter F. Patel-Schneider >>> <pfpschneider@gmail.com <mailto:pfpschneider@gmail.com>> wrote: > ...>> The most important in my view, however, is that SHACL centrally uses >>> pre-binding, i.e., evaluating SPARQL queries with variables "pre-bound" to >>> values. In the above query the variables using $ are all pre-bound. >> >> to my understanding, as this group has been described by andy seaborne, >> that topic is not in its scope. > > [… lots of evocative hand waving ...] > But it does look to me that it is so close to actual situation with EXISTS that what this CG does will be strong candidate for SHACL. if you have changed your mind, or the situation has changed, that is all fine, but, please, stop the waving of hands and provide a concrete example. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 July 2016 21:18:38 UTC