- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 23:08:16 +0000
- To: public-sparql-exists@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 23:08:47 UTC
good morning; > On 2016-07-05, at 23:38, Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com> wrote: > > […] > > I believe there's probably general agreement on what the intuitive results should be in many uses of EXISTS. I suspect (and would love to see/gather implementation reports to confirm or refute) that there is probably a lot of overlap in what implementations are already doing when it comes to EXISTS queries. And I believe the goal here should be to find agreement on the desired semantics informed by existing implementation behavior, […]. this is the reasonable place to start. without it, nothing else is possible. best regards, from berlin, --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2016 23:08:47 UTC