- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@atomgraph.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 22:14:17 +0200
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Hi, I was thinking whether the VALUES syntax can be considered equivalent to SPARQL results? Which would mean that the SPARQL result media types can be used to provide data to be injected into a query as VALUES? My use case is implementing named parameterized SPARQL queries as described here: https://patterns.dataincubator.org/book/parameterised-query.html Such a query gets deployed as an HTTP endpoint, for example http://example.org/sparql/concepts_by_scheme Multi-column value data is inconvenient to pass using URL parameters in a GET request. So another option would be to POST that data to the endpoint, but in what format? It's tabular data with RDF terms, and as far as I can see it can be round-tripped to SPARQL results formats. Can someone confirm this makes sense? Or maybe this is commonly used already :) Example: POST http://example.org/sparql/concepts_by_scheme Content-Type: application/sparql-results+json { "head": { "vars": [ "concept_scheme", "graph_uri" ] } , "results": { "bindings": [ { "concept_scheme": { "type": "uri" , "value": "http://example.org/schemes/42" } , "graph_uri": { "type": "uri" , "value": "http://example.org/graphs/42" } } , { "concept_scheme": { "type": "uri" , "value": "http://example.org/schemes/66" } , "graph_uri": { "type": "uri" , "value": "http://example.org/graphs/66" } } ] } } becomes VALUES (?concept_scheme ?graph_uri) { (<http://example.org/schemes/42> <http://example.org/graphs/42>) (<http://example.org/schemes/66> <http://example.org/graphs/66>) } Martynas
Received on Thursday, 3 October 2024 20:14:33 UTC