- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:40:10 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Hi John,
Thank you for the comment.
I've added the first to the SPARQL Errata document:
https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#errata-results-2
The second problem is already recorded:
https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#errata-results-1
The errata document would be input to another W3C working group - there
isn't a plan/timescale for that as far as I know,
There is a community group
http://w3c.github.io/rdf-tests/
looking after the test suite for RDF 1.1 and SPARQL 1.1
Andy
On 05/09/18 14:03, John Walker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are a couple of issues regarding XML Schemas in SPARQL Query Results XML Format Recommendation [1].
>
> Firstly the method used to reference the XML Schema xsi:schemaLocation shown in the recommendation is incorrect.
> Pairs of URIs must be used to relate a namespace to the schema location:
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <sparql xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#"
> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
> xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results# http://www.w3.org/2007/SPARQL/result.xsd">
>
> ...
>
> </sparql>
>
> Secondly the namespace defined in the recommendation (http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#) is different from the one used in the various schemas (http://www.w3.org/2007/SPARQL/results#).
> As a result, the SPARQL Results Document XML will never validate using the schemas.
> The namespaces need to be aligned either by changing the recommendation (probably hard) or updating the schemas (probably easier).
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20130321/#schemas
>
> Regards,
>
> John Walker
> Principal Consultant & co-founder
>
> Semaku B.V. | Torenallee 20 (SFJ 3D) | 5617 BC Eindhoven | T +31 6 42590072 | https://semaku.com/
> KvK: 58031405 | BTW: NL852842156B01 | IBAN: NL94 INGB 0008 3219 95
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2018 09:40:35 UTC