- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:40:10 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Hi John, Thank you for the comment. I've added the first to the SPARQL Errata document: https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#errata-results-2 The second problem is already recorded: https://www.w3.org/2013/sparql-errata#errata-results-1 The errata document would be input to another W3C working group - there isn't a plan/timescale for that as far as I know, There is a community group http://w3c.github.io/rdf-tests/ looking after the test suite for RDF 1.1 and SPARQL 1.1 Andy On 05/09/18 14:03, John Walker wrote: > Hi, > > There are a couple of issues regarding XML Schemas in SPARQL Query Results XML Format Recommendation [1]. > > Firstly the method used to reference the XML Schema xsi:schemaLocation shown in the recommendation is incorrect. > Pairs of URIs must be used to relate a namespace to the schema location: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <sparql xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#" > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results# http://www.w3.org/2007/SPARQL/result.xsd"> > > ... > > </sparql> > > Secondly the namespace defined in the recommendation (http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results#) is different from the one used in the various schemas (http://www.w3.org/2007/SPARQL/results#). > As a result, the SPARQL Results Document XML will never validate using the schemas. > The namespaces need to be aligned either by changing the recommendation (probably hard) or updating the schemas (probably easier). > > [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-rdf-sparql-XMLres-20130321/#schemas > > Regards, > > John Walker > Principal Consultant & co-founder > > Semaku B.V. | Torenallee 20 (SFJ 3D) | 5617 BC Eindhoven | T +31 6 42590072 | https://semaku.com/ > KvK: 58031405 | BTW: NL852842156B01 | IBAN: NL94 INGB 0008 3219 95 > >
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2018 09:40:35 UTC