- From: Pavel Klinov <pavel@stardog.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 13:08:15 +0200
- To: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
- Cc: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2017 12:56:31 UTC
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:08 AM, Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> wrote: > Why does SPARQL 1.1 not contain requesting an ordered RDF list > (rdf:first/rdf:rest/rdf:nil)?! > > It is a highly useful feature. I am to using it in my software. > Well, no disrespect, but this isn't quite a strong evidence of utility... > There is ORDER BY, but it seems it cannot be used for this kind of > query. > You can implement most basic operations, e.g. accessing the n-th element or all elements, using property paths. It may not be completely trivial but it's not rocket science either. [1] is a good reference. Best, Pavel [1] http://www.snee.com/bobdc.blog/2014/04/rdf-lists-and-sparql.html > > Let's discuss how to make such an extension to SPARQL. > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 July 2017 12:56:31 UTC