- From: Jörn Hees <j_hees@cs.uni-kl.de>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 19:47:27 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Hi, over at RDFLib we got a bug report [1] that our SPARQL engine produces weird results for an aggregate query over result sets with undefined variables like this: SELECT ?x (SAMPLE(?y) as ?ys) (SAMPLE(?z) as ?zs) WHERE { VALUES (?x ?y ?z) { (2 6 UNDEF) (2 UNDEF 10) (3 UNDEF 15) (3 9 UNDEF) (5 UNDEF 25) } } GROUP BY ?x Intuitively my understanding is that this should produce a result set like this: VALUES (?x ?ys ?zs) { (2 6 10) (3 9 15) (5 UNDEF 25) } I fixed this in [2], but there seems to be confusion what the correct solution is (not only between the RDFLib devs): - Virtuoso returns the above [1] - Jena returns { (2 UNDEF UNDEF) (3 UNDEF UNDEF) (5 UNDEF 25) } [2] So what's the correct answer? Cheers, Jörn PS: The relevant sections seem to be [3], [4] and [5], but to me don't seem explicit enough to answer the above. PPS: I also couldn't find any tests in [6] for the above. [1]: https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/563 [2]: https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/567 [3]: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#defn_aggSample [4]: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#aggregateExample2 [5]: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#aggregateAlgebra [6]: https://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/
Received on Friday, 29 January 2016 18:47:58 UTC