- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:33:02 +0000
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
On 29/11/15 01:45, Tara Athan wrote:
> Update: In a private reply, someone mentioned that it is possible to
> create and update named graphs in a Graph Store, e.g. with the SPARQL
> Update language. However, in my usecase, I am only interested in
> creating an immutable RDF Dataset, not a mutable Graph Store. This hint
> was useful in letting me see what a CONSTRUCT for an RDF Dataset might
> look like, though (patterned after INSERT).
>
> For example, suppose I want to filter an RDF Dataset to extract a new
> dataset where only named graphs having a metadata triple in the default
> graph matching a certain filter are retained. It might be expressed so:
>
> CONSTRUCT
> { ?name ex:observedAt ?date
> GRAPH ?name
> { ?s ?p ?o}
> }
> WHERE
> {
> { ?name ex:observedAt ?date }
> GRAPH ?name
> {?s ?p ?o}
> FILTER (?date > 2015-06-01)
> }
In this particular example, do the results need to exactly conform to
the structure of the dataset? If the ex:observedAt is put in the
results in the same graph:
CONSTRUCT
{ ?name ex:observedAt ?date
?s ?p ?o
}
WHERE ...
>
> Is there any theoretical or technical obstacle to this?
There's no obstacle. A Google Summer of Code project added this to
Apache Jena this year and it'll be in the next release.
It follows the design you gave:
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/construct-quad.html
Andy
>
> Tara
>
Received on Sunday, 29 November 2015 10:33:33 UTC