- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 14:42:51 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
On 31/08/15 17:40, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 31/08/15 13:07, Michael Schmidt wrote: >> James, all, >> >> thanks for your feedback. As I understand your response, you would agree >> with my assessment of the expected query results — because in all cases >> at least one of the variables is not bound in the respective scope, so >> all queries return the empty result. >> >> When it comes to the FILTER queries, there’s broad "agreement" amongst >> the engines I tested. However, for queries 2a. and 2b. one can observe >> that many (most) engines, amongst them Sesame and Jena, actually do >> deliver answers. The same is true for a slight variant of 2b, which >> pushes the variable bindings into a surrounding VALUES clause: > > Any chance of filing a bug report? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA > > (it looks an optimizer issue) > > Andy > Michael kindly raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1018 Andy
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2015 13:43:21 UTC