- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 10:04:30 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
The aggregate handle errors based on the nature of each aggregates: e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#defn_aggCount "remove error elements from N" so count(?x) is the number of defined ?x in the group, count(*) the number of rows, count(if(?x = 99),1,0)) the number of times 99 occurs. Sum(?x) does not remove error or indeed non-numbers: so sum(1+2+undef) is undef as is sum(1+"oops") Sum(coalesce(?x,0)) on {1, 2, undef} is 3. Sum(coalesce(?x+0,0)) on {1, 2, "oops"} is 3. There is no canonical result for sample(). Andy On 31/03/15 01:54, james anderson wrote: > good evening, > > should the sparql aggregation mechanism exclude unbound elements from > the aggregation set? > must it? > may it? > > in order for a query to correlate elements from sparse graphs, it seems > that the unbound elements should be excluded. > still, i wonder what the recommendation intended. > there appears to be no directly relevant test in the w3c suite and while > the language in the recommendation permits the more useful result, it > leaves open the consequences, should the respective value set include > undef markers only. > > to be specific, is there a canonical result for the following query? > > select ?o > (sample(?s) as ?sSample) > (count(?s) as ?sCount) > (sample(?p) as ?pSample) > (count(?p) as ?pCount) > (sum(?v) as ?vSum) > where { > values (?s ?p ?o ?v) > { (<http://example.org/s1> undef <http://example.org/o1> undef) > (<http://example.org/s2> undef <http://example.org/o1> 1) > (<http://example.org/s3> undef <http://example.org/o1> undef) > (<http://example.org/s4> <http://example.org/p4> > <http://example.org/o1> 1) > (<http://example.org/s5> undef <http://example.org/o2> undef) > (<http://example.org/s6> undef <http://example.org/o2> 1) > (<http://example.org/s7> <http://example.org/p6> > <http://example.org/o3> 1) > (<http://example.org/s8> undef <http://example.org/o3> 1) > } > } group by ?o > > > > best regards, from berlin, > --- > james anderson | james@dydra.com <mailto:james@dydra.com> | http://dydra.com > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2015 09:05:05 UTC