- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 10:38:03 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve@totl.net>
- CC: "public-sparql-dev@w3.org" <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>
On 26/03/15 10:25, Steve Harris wrote: > >> On 26 Mar 2015, at 10:10, Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org> wrote: >> >> On 24/03/15 16:48, Fabiano Luz wrote: >>>> Hello Folks, >>> On the predicate lists we have omitted the subject, for example: >>> >>> ?x foaf:name ?name ; >>> foaf:mbox ?mbox . >>> >>> >>> I wonder if there is some kind of "subject lists" where we omitted the >>> predicate, for example: >>> >>> foaf:Bob foaf:phone ?phone1; foaf:John ?phone2 . >>> >>> >>> PS: I do not want to repeat the predicate. >>> >>> best regards >>> >>> -- >>> Fabiano Ferreira Luz® >>> MsC in Computer Science >> >> Fabiano, >> >> There isn't any specific syntax to abbreviate in that way (in Turtle or SPARQL), only "same subject, same predicate", not "different subject, same predicate". >> >> What's you use case for this? > > I was wondering about this, what happens if you write: > > :foo ^rdf:value :a , :b , :c . :foo ^rdf:value :a . :foo ^rdf:value :b . :foo ^rdf:value :c . That might help or it might not (in SPARQL patterns, not Turtle, not in construct templates, not in update templates). Is then ":a" a "subject"? Yes - in a forward arc sense. No - in the written form sense as described. Andy > > - Steve >
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 10:38:33 UTC