- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 00:49:17 +0200
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 22:49:48 UTC
good morning; On 8 Jul 2014, at 00:27, Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com> wrote: > > > I was thinking about SAMPLE and feel that there is a bug with the spec because it allows > > > A=1 B=2 > > as an answer from > > SELECT (SAMPLE(?a) as ?A) (SAMPLE(?b) as ?B) > { > { BIND(1 as ?a) BIND(1 as ?b)} > UNION > { BIND(2 as ?a) BIND(2 as ?b)} > } > > > I think the principal of least surprise would suggest that a single select should use the same solution to pick out the sample values, giving either 1,1 or 2,2 as possible solutions here. what would be the consequence of a solution in which one of the variables was not bound? > > Jeremy > > > --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 22:49:48 UTC