Re: boolean shorthand for common optional/union patterns

On 6 December 2010 19:13, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
> You may be interested in the property paths feature which is in the SPARQL
> 1.1 Query drafts. Please take a look at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#propertypaths

Right...first example even :)

Before shuffling back out again I'll just note that the use of
booleans isn't "a new query language" as dajobe describe property
paths, just a sweetener for the current syntax - may be pertinent if
the spec gets modularised.

Thanks Lee.

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://danny.ayers.name

Received on Tuesday, 7 December 2010 16:07:41 UTC