- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:43:40 -0600
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: public-sparql-dev <public-sparql-dev@w3.org>, public-rdfa <public-rdfa@w3.org>
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 17:41 +0100, Ivan Herman wrote: [...] > Which unnecessarily complicates the structure. OK, those examples help. This sort of generality is less helpful: > There is another issue. There is already deployed RDFa out there. Quite > a lot, actually. If you could give a few examples, that would make the case much more strongly. > As a consequence, there is a strong requirement of > backward compatibility in the RDFa WG charter. This also means that if > the @rev is removed from the core HTML5 document, RDFa will have it > alongside the RDFa specific attributes like @about or @resource... My understanding is that there's just one design that W3C is working on for RDFa in text/html; it will either have @rev or it will not. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 8 March 2010 17:43:43 UTC