- From: Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 09:57:05 -0500
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 14:57:17 UTC
Hi All -- Is there a consensus emerging please on the syntax and semantics* of SPARQL aggregation over RDF? If I understand correctly, there are some implementations doing their own things, but as yet no standard. If that's indeed the case, is there a timeline for a standard? Surely, SPARQL should avoid the multi-vendor situation that SQL got in to on this matter? Thanks for educating me about this, -- Adrian * Semantics as in, ideally, a model theory that says what the result of any aggregation must be. Internet Business Logic A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 14:57:17 UTC