- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:56:52 -0400
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>
> SELECT ?a ?b
> FROM ( CONSTRUCT { ?d <b> ?b }
> FROM < http://example.com/sparql?>
> WHERE { ?b <b> ?d } )
> WHERE { ?a <b> ?b }
Yes... the Data Access WG considered this sort of thing briefly;
we didn't see any particular reason not to do it but we...
RESOLVED 2005-01-20: to postpone cascadedQueries; while federation use
cases are interesting, the designs don't seem mature and the use cases
are not urgent; with KendallC abstaining.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#cascadedQueries
I'm happy to see people playing around with it; I hope the
designs get mature soonish.
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 03:56:50 UTC