Re: SPARQL/Update

> Ditto. My first impressions (the only bit that would perhaps have been
> worth bringing over here is subsumed by Richard's comment above):
>
> http://dannyayers.com/2007/03/09/sparql-update

... and mine are here, along with a suggestion for a name change:

http://www.holygoat.co.uk/blog/entry/2007-03-09-2

Received on Friday, 9 March 2007 17:27:24 UTC