- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 11:36:19 +0100
- To: public-sparql-dev@w3.org
- Cc: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@burningbird.net>
Received on Sunday, 7 January 2007 10:36:31 UTC
I just read a blog post [1] from Shelley Powers in which she talks about JSON vs XML and goes into RDF/XML vs Turtle territory a bit. Seems like a lot of the potential XML tool interop that a 'nice' RDF/XML* might have provided is now available through SPARQL results. While commenting over there it occurred to me that one aspect that doesn't seem to be available is a streaming style of access a la SAX. Ok, this is completely off the top of my head, may well be a non-starter - any obvious reasons it couldn't work? If not, has anyone looked into/implemented this? Would say hooking up result iterators to just-in-time XML generation make sense? I'm guessing it should be feasible but only useful with a subset of possible query patterns. Could be sweet for performance/scale though, not to mention queries over Jabber... Cheers, Danny. [1] http://burningbird.net/technology/learning-javascript/to-json-or-not-to-json (* I suspect a genuinely nice RDF/XML is an unfindable Holy Grail - either you'd have to ditch the XML tree-friendly striping style or the graph-friendly statement style) -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Sunday, 7 January 2007 10:36:31 UTC