Re: where are we at?

There's a few proposals that have my interest, but high on my wish list and a relatively easy one to fix is a solution for https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/43, possibly in combination with https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/59 <https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/issues/43>. (a standard way to refer to the unnamed graph and/or the union graph). It's a fairly straightforward improvement, I imagine a SEP could be drafted for that quite quickly. The many tool specific solutions that exist in this space are IMO strong evidence for the need for something more standardized. 

I'll see what I can do over the next few days.  

Cheers,

Jeen

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020, at 13:17, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2020, at 5:40 PM, Jeen Broekstra <jeen@fastmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks Andy, for reminding me about the SEP thing!
>> 
>> This completely slipped my mind, and to be honest it took me a while to figure where to actually find the SEPs (I think I originally interpreted this as a proposal for a github issue template). I now realize they are written down as Markdown documents in https://github.com/w3c/sparql-12/tree/master/SEP .
>> 
>> If I were to spend some time on some of the proposals I care about and try and formulate them as a SEP, would that be appreciated? Sorry if this seems a silly question -  I genuinely didn't realize we were doing this. 
> 
> I think that would be greatly appreciated. Do you already have particular issues/topics in mind?
> 
> Thanks,
> Greg
>