- From: Jürgen Jakobitsch <juergen.jakobitsch@semantic-web.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:13:58 +0200
- To: Boris Pelakh <boris.pelakh@semanticarts.com>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, "public-sparql-12@w3.org" <public-sparql-12@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAETaefwcmQT3-7nL2QS-0WgkLXVRjKzBO64KSkyrPdSE9cPiiw@mail.gmail.com>
hi there, in any case i've got extended experience in SPARQL evaluation implementations and am willing to contribute implementations based on rdf4j api and virtuoso PL/SQL where applicable . this will give us at least an idea where it is worth the effort and where things can get messy or complicated.. krj *Jürgen Jakobitsch* Senior Technical Consultant Semantic Web Company GmbH EU: +43-14021235 <+43%201%204021235> US: (415) 800-3776 Mobile: +43-676-6212710 <+43%20676%206212710> https://www.poolparty.biz https://www.semantic-web.com *Download E-Book*: Introducing Semantic AI <https://www.poolparty.biz/machine-learning-meets-semantics/> Am Mi., 3. Apr. 2019 um 15:59 Uhr schrieb Boris Pelakh < boris.pelakh@semanticarts.com>: > We are really in the brain-storming part of the process. We'll have plenty > of opportunity to shoot ideas down, or put them on a back burner. Sometimes > a person proposing a feature does not have the expertise to implement it, > or even assess the feasibility of the implementation. DB vendors will weigh > in on that aspect of the request, but we don't want to lose the ideas > before they have been considered. Our primary gating criteria right now > should be 1) Is there a demonstrated need for this feature, and 2) does it > fit well into the existing SPARQL paradigm. > > > Boris > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 9:02:40 AM > *To:* public-sparql-12@w3.org > *Subject:* a plea for parsimony > > Maybe this is too early in the process of the CG to discuss this, but I > already worry that there will be many, many cries for new features and not > enough analysis of the new features for suitability or implementability or > ease of use or .... > > It is easy to propose a new feature. What gating conditions is the CG > going > to impose on what makes it into any report for a future WG? I am in > favour > of stringent gating conditions, even to the point of formal description and > actual implementation. > > peter > >
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2019 14:14:33 UTC