Re: Trade-offs Matrix: Solid Term Definition Strategies

Hi Melvin,

 

IMHO for Global Standard:

 
“encourages rapid prototyping” & “simple for developers” there can always be a section of an ontology for *.unstable or *.beta – further, you should provide examples as JSON-LD to encourage adoption (not everyone will understand RDF)
“privacy preserving” – no idea what is the criteria for saying this? 
“works offline” – sure they do, you can download a public ontology (they usually are shared because they are stable).
___________________________________

Joshua Cornejo

marketdata

smart authorisation management for the AI-era

 

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 12:15
To: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
Subject: Trade-offs Matrix: Solid Term Definition Strategies
Resent-From: <public-solid@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 11:15:06 +0000

 

Hi all,

Following up on recent discussions, here's a draft summary of the trade-offs between different strategies for defining RDF predicates in Solid apps — particularly useful during early-stage development and prototyping.

 

https://github.com/solid-lite/urn-solid/wiki

Best

Melvin

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2025 11:48:50 UTC