- From: Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 12:48:43 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2025 11:48:50 UTC
Hi Melvin, IMHO for Global Standard: “encourages rapid prototyping” & “simple for developers” there can always be a section of an ontology for *.unstable or *.beta – further, you should provide examples as JSON-LD to encourage adoption (not everyone will understand RDF) “privacy preserving” – no idea what is the criteria for saying this? “works offline” – sure they do, you can download a public ontology (they usually are shared because they are stable). ___________________________________ Joshua Cornejo marketdata smart authorisation management for the AI-era From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 22 May 2025 at 12:15 To: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org> Subject: Trade-offs Matrix: Solid Term Definition Strategies Resent-From: <public-solid@w3.org> Resent-Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 11:15:06 +0000 Hi all, Following up on recent discussions, here's a draft summary of the trade-offs between different strategies for defining RDF predicates in Solid apps — particularly useful during early-stage development and prototyping. https://github.com/solid-lite/urn-solid/wiki Best Melvin
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2025 11:48:50 UTC