Re: urn:solid: for prototyping predicates

čt 22. 5. 2025 v 9:16 odesílatel Christoph Braun <braun3@fzi.de> napsal:

> Dear all,
>
> just a curious question: As a developer, have you considered just
> publishing your vocabulary on your Solid Pod and be done with it for fast
> prototyping?
> I have done that in the past and that worked great. See e.g. [1,2] or
> [3,4,5].
>

Yes, I have done this many times.  But the main issue with this is that
since it is your own pod, you are unlikely to get interop with other apps.

Each approach comes with trade-offs.  Perhaps we should simply list and
tell devs the trade-offs?


>
> Cheers
> Christoph
>
> [1] https://uvdsl.solid.aifb.kit.edu/ontology/web-push
> [2] https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000149760
>
> [3] https://uvdsl.solid.aifb.kit.edu/ontology/svcs-context
> [4] https://uvdsl.solid.aifb.kit.edu/ontology/svcs
> [5] https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000152048
>
> On 22/05/2025 09:08, Michiel de Jong wrote:
>
> Thanks!
> During the call, I was actually convinced by Jesse’s point, so I’m now
> proposing we use URLs, but we use ones that a dev can write to. :)
>
> On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 07:30, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> Quick note following yesterday’s CG call.  Michiel and I were
>> brainstorming around using "urns :solid" as a simple way to prototype
>> predicates while waiting for proper HTTP URIs to be minted.
>>
>> It could be a handy trick for rapid app development, especially in
>> lighter-weight stacks like Solid Lite.
>>
>> Jesse raised a valid point in opposition, that http URIs (e.g. at
>> w3id.org) might be a better long-term approach for structured
>> vocabularies,
>>
>> But for quick iterations this feels like a good fit.
>>
>> In any case, I wrote up a short spec draft here if you're curious:
>>
>> https://solid-lite.github.io/urn-solid/
>>
>> Would love any thoughts!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Melvin
>>
>
>