Re: Solid CG work Items ∩ LWS WG charter deliverables

čt 30. 1. 2025 v 13:59 odesílatel elf Pavlik <elf-pavlik@hackers4peace.net>
napsal:

> Hi Sarven,
>
> > Has the Solid CG recently decided to continue working on (some or all)
> > items that are also part of the LWS WG charter deliverables? I would
> > appreciate any references to the CG decision and updates to the charter
> > reflecting this.
>
> We discussed it yesterday during the CG meeting
>
> https://github.com/solid/specification/blob/main/meetings/2025-01-29.md#state-of-cg-reports
>
> Given the following text in the LWS WG charter
> https://www.w3.org/2024/09/linked-web-storage-wg-charter.html#dependencies
>
> "Depending on the Working Group progress, including consideration for
> adequate implementation experience, the Group may also decide to adopt
> the following dependencies as input documents"
>
> The general understanding is that only the core Solid Protocol report is
> currently an input of the WG.
> As the WG advances it can signal that some of the normative references
> listed in the charter will also become WG inputs.
> So, all the CG reports listed as dependencies are still work items of
> the Solid CG.
>
> I would also keep in mind that the CG will provide full git repositories
> as input when the WG requests specific reports. This means that the WG
> has a very granular history, even more granular than the versioned
> snapshots some reports have been creating. Except for ACP, I would also
> expect that all the editors and most of the authors of the Solid CG
> drafts will be available to clarify the background of any changes made
> to the CG drafts whenever WG needs that additional information.
>
> For a clearer process of how CG <-> WG process can work, I would like us
> to consider work done by FedID CG+WG on specifying that process
> https://github.com/w3c-fedid/Administration/blob/main/proposals-CG-WG.md


Without diving into the whole doc—can we just adopt Stage 0? Seems logical,
straightforward, obvious

Stage 0: Exploration

The purpose of Stage 0 proposals is to allow anyone to raise and explore
the Problem Space without asking for permission.

    What's needed from individuals?
        Typically, a written issue, a personal repo, a blog post, a tweet,
etc.
    What's asked of the Community Group?
        Nothing: no permission needed from anyone.


>
>
> Even if we don't see it 100% fitting our needs, we can always propose
> changes upstream or fork it. Either way, it should result in a decent
> reference documenting the preferred practice.
>
> Best regards,
> elf Pavlik
>
>
>