- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:27:01 +0100
- To: Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md>
- Cc: public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKvuCakofZHAkUnYCAfSvPJEM9GV_TApXCWO5BdzH78wQ@mail.gmail.com>
čt 23. 1. 2025 v 19:29 odesílatel Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md> napsal: > I am in the middle because not everything needs fixing, and maybe not all > use cases will be ‘fixable’. I already put a comment on the page Melvin > distributed: > > > > “it would be useful to start by drawing a high-level architecture, so > everyone has the same alignment. (for example "deploying agents" gives a > different flavour than "accessing solid pods").” > > > > The easiest approach (IMHO) is always to build the use cases and a level-0 > architecture. > Hi Joshua I think high-level architecture is a great idea, and something we can work on. Perhaps you might want to give it a go? Aside from that a protocol for agent commis is emerging, namely, Model Context Protocol (MCP) This might also be something worth looking at: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/introduction Best Melvin > > > From parallel conversations and research, there are elements of > authentication/authorisation that don’t exist today for some use cases (for > example, “delegating access” has always been exceptional and involves > aspects from both). > > > > Regards, > > ___________________________________ > > *Joshua Cornejo* > > *marketdata <https://www.marketdata.md/>* > > smart authorisation management for the AI-era > > > > *From: *"Jeff Zucker (he/him)" <dubzed@gmail.com> > *Date: *Thursday 23 January 2025 at 17:37 > *To: *Sindhu Raju <sindhu2@mac.com> > *Cc: *Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-solid < > public-solid@w3.org>, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>, > Andrei Ciortea <andrei.ciortea@inria.fr> > *Subject: *Re: Moving Forward with Agentic Linked Data > *Resent-From: *<public-solid@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:37:07 +0000 > > > > > Sindhu Raju wrote "My understanding of SOLID. it meant for individual > data" > > > > I strongly disagree with this statement. There are numerous use cases and > actual applications aimed at organizations and enterprises. Who do you > think are Inrupt's customers? The construction industry clients on Trinpod > are not individuals. I can name a dozen different Solid apps aimed at > homeless service case workers, community health clinics, tracking > sustainability information and other types of data that goes far beyond the > individual. INRIA has a major project aimed at small farm inventory. > SOLID is for both individuals and organizations, > > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 8:51 AM Sindhu Raju <sindhu2@mac.com> wrote: > > Hi Melvin, > > > > I think we should have discussion on types of of agents and use cases. My > understanding of SOLID. it meant for individual data and I think we should > limit the scope to individuals and their use cases. I think discussing > agents at large is not appropriate and not a good use of our time. In fact > we should only be discussing Agents in a manner that the general public can > understand. > > > > Thanks, > > Sindhu > > > > On Jan 23, 2025, at 7:25 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > Thanks to all who’ve shown interest in the idea of Agentic Linked Data. > The conversations so far have been great! > > As requested, I’ve put together a short document to gather thoughts, > ideas, and participants. It’s a living document, so feel free to jump in, > add your name, share your expertise, or propose new topics: > > > > https://hackmd.io/@jSWt69rrQAKeUTsa_s49Qg/H16RCGRv1g > > For convenience, here’s the content: > ------------------------------ > > *Agentic Linked Data* > > This document is based on discussions on the Solid mailing list around > Agentic Linked Data [1]. It contains a list of participants who’ve shown > interest. > > *1. Discussion Participants So Far* > Below is a list of participants with a short description of interest. > Please edit the text as desired. > > - *Melvin Carvalho*: Initiated the discussion. Interested in Agents > and AI. > - *Joshua Cornejo*: Experienced in ODRL and authorization architecture. > - *Eric Jahn*: Interested in agent roles and permissions. > - *Aad Versteden*: Integrates AI and Linked Data in semantic.works. > - *Sindhu Raju*: Focuses on personal data management and consumer use > cases. > - *Matt Taylor*: Consultant in ethical tech, cautious about broad > agentic access. > - *Ram Mukund Kripa*: Developed privacy agents for consent management. > - *Jesse Wright*: Highlighted the Web Agents CG. > - *Jacob Beauchamp*: Exploring agentic learning and entity data. > - *Knut-Olav Hoven*: Agent Linked Data. > - *Leonard Rosenthol*: C2PA and Trust Signals. > - *Harshvardhan J. Pandit*: Data Privacy Vocabularies (DPV). > - *Antoine Zimmermann*: Chair of Webagents CG, knowledge transfer. > - *Kurt Cagle*: Interested in how this is evolving. > - *Davi Ottenheimer*: Modelling Agents. > - *Mark Lizar*: Agents, privacy, legal aspects, and DPV. > > *Add your name here!* > > *2. Potential Topics of Interest* > Below is a list of topics, in no particular order, that could be > interesting to work on in the future: > > - A common understanding of the term "Agent" > - Deploying Agents to Solid Pods > > *Add a topic here!* > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-solid/2024Dec/0014.html > ------------------------------ > > > Next Steps: > > - We’ll consolidate ideas and propose a direction in the next *2 weeks* > . > - Identify topics of interest and who’s keen to explore them further. > - Liaise with the Web Agents CG. > - Talk to folks in the Solid CG about structuring this (e.g., forming > a Task Force). > > Please feel free to edit the document with your thoughts—we’ll tidy things > up and summarize in the coming weeks. > > Looking forward to an *Agentic 2025!* > > Best wishes, > Melvin > > > >
Received on Monday, 10 February 2025 10:27:17 UTC