Re: Agentic Linked Data -- attempt 2

Hello,

I would also be interested in this discussion. I am working on a project in regards to personal data management. 

I think it would be helpful to delineate where AI agents may be helpful and or a hinderance via consumer use cases.

Thanks,
Sindhu Raju




> On Dec 30, 2024, at 12:05 AM, Joshua Cornejo <josh@marketdata.md> wrote:
> 
> Interesting coincidence that someone posted this on LinkedIn and appeared on my timeline.
> 
> I like the quote “Agents should be skeptical of assertions that they read on the Semantic Web until they have checked the sources of information.”.
> 
> Maybe the vision is that authorisation (can the agent read the data) coexists with validation (is the data legitimate).
> 
> https://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/cours/essi2006/Scientific%20American_%20Feature%20Article_%20The%20Semantic%20Web_%20May%202001.pdf
> _________________________
> Joshua Cornejo
> marketdata <https://www.marketdata.md/>
> smart authorisation management for the AI-era
> 
>> On 29 Dec 2024, at 22:04, Aad Versteden <aad.versteden@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> 
>> An exciting and necessary extension indeed.
>> 
>> I would also like to follow this too, perhaps from a short distance
>> assuming time doesn't permit.  Agentic Linked Data fits closely to how
>> we use Linked Data within semantic.works [1][2] so we can share what
>> we've learned over time.  Microservices act as Agents manipulating data
>> in semantic.works and we manage to share many microservices across
>> applications.  Everything we do is based on SPARQL so some differences
>> with Solid do exist.  We integrate Artificial Intelligence [3] in the
>> same way as microservices which handle login, registration or sending
>> out emails[4].
>> 
>> When we squint our eyes we shouldn't notice too much of a difference in
>> an Agent being a if-this-then-that construct, a Deep Neural Network, an
>> OWL reasoner, an LLM, or a human.  This should be a natural and
>> hopefully straightforward extension to Solid.
>> 
>> A FOAF Agent based approach would also lend itself to support backend
>> processes on Solid Pods.  We found this to be one of the bigger
>> technical challenges to apply Solid Pods more in our business setting
>> and it was one of the key technical challenges for Solid Shop[5].
>> 
>> All in all, this may become a minor guideline or extension opening up
>> many possibilities.
>> 
>> 
>> Exciting work ahead,
>> 
>> Aad
>> 
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/mu-semtech
>> [2] https://semantic.works/
>> [3] https://github.com/semantic-ai/translation-nl-en-service
>> [4] https://github.com/lblod/berichtencentrum-deliver-email-service
>> [5] https://github.com/redpencilio/app-solid-shop
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Aad Versteden
>> Technical Futurist
>> CEO
>> 
>> Proudly building the #WebWeWant at redpencil.io
>> 
>> GitHub: @madnificent
>> Mastodon: @madnificent@mastodon.social
>> Mail: aad.versteden@redpencil.io
>> Web: https://redpencil.io
>> Tel: +32476513848
>