Re: Agentic Linked Data -- attempt 2

Hi all,


An exciting and necessary extension indeed.

I would also like to follow this too, perhaps from a short distance
assuming time doesn't permit.  Agentic Linked Data fits closely to how
we use Linked Data within semantic.works [1][2] so we can share what
we've learned over time.  Microservices act as Agents manipulating data
in semantic.works and we manage to share many microservices across
applications.  Everything we do is based on SPARQL so some differences
with Solid do exist.  We integrate Artificial Intelligence [3] in the
same way as microservices which handle login, registration or sending
out emails[4].

When we squint our eyes we shouldn't notice too much of a difference in
an Agent being a if-this-then-that construct, a Deep Neural Network, an
OWL reasoner, an LLM, or a human.  This should be a natural and
hopefully straightforward extension to Solid.

A FOAF Agent based approach would also lend itself to support backend
processes on Solid Pods.  We found this to be one of the bigger
technical challenges to apply Solid Pods more in our business setting
and it was one of the key technical challenges for Solid Shop[5].

All in all, this may become a minor guideline or extension opening up
many possibilities.


Exciting work ahead,

Aad


[1] https://github.com/mu-semtech
[2] https://semantic.works/
[3] https://github.com/semantic-ai/translation-nl-en-service
[4] https://github.com/lblod/berichtencentrum-deliver-email-service
[5] https://github.com/redpencilio/app-solid-shop

--

Aad Versteden
 Technical Futurist
 CEO

Proudly building the #WebWeWant at redpencil.io

 GitHub: @madnificent
 Mastodon: @madnificent@mastodon.social
 Mail: aad.versteden@redpencil.io
 Web: https://redpencil.io
 Tel: +32476513848

Received on Sunday, 29 December 2024 22:35:10 UTC