- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 17:12:13 +0100
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2023 16:12:16 UTC
Hi Melvin, On 21/11/2023 02:49, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > LDP Next community group [1] was closed last month > > Pierre had the suggestion of creating an LDP 2.0 and basing Solid 1.0 > WG on that. > > This might be a great idea. Judging from a number of responses I got saying "no, Solid is actually not really based on LDP", this might not be such a great idea :-P But appart from that... > > In addition to this, there is likely a need to align LDP next with the > new emerging WebID 1.0 spec > > I will definitely have a need for this for solid-lite, so it's going > to be useful in any case. > > Question for Pierre: how much support would be required to reopen the > LDP next group? I'd like to off some support for such an idea and > pick up where it left off. ... this would be a question for team-community-process@w3.org, but my 2ยข is that you would need to demonstrate enough support for the group, just like for creating a new one. This means having 5 people supporting the re-opening of the group. But again, check this with team-community-process@w3.org . pa > > Best > Melvin > > [1] https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/ldpnext/ >
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2023 16:12:16 UTC