Re: Will RDF 1.2 be part of Solid 1.x?

so 20. 5. 2023 v 19:43 odesílatel ben@bengo.co <ben@bengo.co> napsal:

> I’m *really* excited about RDF-star.
>
> It would be great to use it with solid, though for many it may be best to
> wait till these are not just at FPWD stage, but have some rounds of
> feedback and advance further to CR.
>

It seems that it will bring Solid a bit closer to full N3, with triples as
predicates and objects

The usefulness of n3 rules and inferences has potential to save a lot of
data transfer over the wire.

This comes at the cost of added complexity for humans, but possibly
machines will take it in their stride.

It reminds me a bit of the original "enquire" system from Tim's book.

Some guess work required to see the bigger picture at this point.


>
> On May 20, 2023, at 6:22 AM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> 
> I raised this question here on the WG Charter
>
> https://github.com/solid/solid-wg-charter/issues/36
>
> I think it's an important thing to know for implementations
>
> Any thoughts on this?
>
> See also:
>
> W3C Blog: https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9906
> HN Thread: https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9906
>
> Blurb:
>
> RDF-star (formerly spelled RDF*) is an extension of RDF that was initially
> proposed in 2014 by Olaf Hartig and Bryan Thompson, providing a concise way
> to make statements about statements. It has become quite popular,
> especially as a means to provide interoperability between RDF and Property
> Graphs, and has already been implemented to various extents by a number of
> vendors and open-source libraries. A subgroup of the RDF-DEV Community
> Group then formed to gather feedback, use-cases, and explore the
> possibility of integrating RDF-star into the existing RDF standards.
>
>