- From: James Doe <jamesdoejr@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 08:40:53 -0400
- To: "Jeff Zucker (he/him)" <dubzed@gmail.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-solid <public-solid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAPRkrBB_Jv1JFfEHuAiM-kvipsF7-EEhqGGPXh3FW7XG0Q8j6w@mail.gmail.com>
Jeff, Thank you very much. That's the information I needed 🚀 I appreciate you, - James Doe, https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdoejr/ On Sun, Jul 9, 2023 at 3:16 PM Jeff Zucker (he/him) <dubzed@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for considering Solid in your project. My understanding is that > the current protocol, the foundational specification of Solid, is in a > stable state and that you can count on compliant Solid servers to follow > what it says. In the next year, it's possible that new features will be > added but unlikely that any existing requirements would be countermanded. > If you have questions about specific features, I encourage you to ask any > question at all in the specifications chat room - > https://app.gitter.im/#/room/#solid_specification:gitter.im. You are also > welcome to attend and ask questions during the community group meetings. > If you have more general questions about Solid, try the forum - > https://forum.solidproject.org/. > > -- > Jeff Zucker > github/gitter/matrix : @jeff-zucker > forum.solidproject.org : @jeffz > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 6:11 AM James Doe <jamesdoejr@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Amazing news, Melvin! >> >> Hey, I'm having a little stickiness and wondering if you could assist. >> I'm coding on a bare-metal project that uses homomorphic pseudonymization >> and `obfuscation through data aggregation` to protect the privacy of people >> who want to try opening up online to others about sensitive and personal >> issues. >> >> I was planning to write the code as proprietary, but after being in this >> group of amazing minds for some weeks, I feel as though it's important that >> my team adopt WebID and Solid as our basis. >> >> Things gain momentum when we move in unison 🚀 >> >> My issue is that I'm still a bit unclear as to the consensus on the >> vision for SOLID interoperability and standardization in the near-term (12 >> to 24 months), and I need this information to pull the trigger on orienting >> this digital mental health project around WebID and Solid core principles. >> >> Would you be able to point me in the direction of a Soli community who >> might be interested in and available to communicate with me about these >> concerns? >> >> Any correspondence is acceptable. Kudos to you for what you do! >> >> I appreciate you, >> - James Doe https://www.linkedin.com/in/jamesdoejr/ >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 3:37 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Just wanted to share some potentially good news with the group. >>> >>> There is the possibility of getting a Solid WG under way around >>> September 2023, hopefully completing around 2025, but maybe after that >>> >>> Nothing is final, and there's still some ways to go, but the issue can >>> be tracked here. >>> >>> https://github.com/solid/solid-wg-charter/issues/41 >>> >>> If the WG goes ahead, we can figure out, as a community group, which >>> bits of work go in which group, as things progress >>> >>
Received on Monday, 10 July 2023 12:41:10 UTC