- From: P. J. Łaszkowicz <phil@fillip.pro>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2020 16:04:01 +0300
- To: public-solid@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E004F95D-7721-450B-BC46-9D9C81BEABA2@fillip.pro>
Thanks for the interest from the SOLID CG. The proposal has now been confirmed so anyone else can join at http://www.w3.org/community/federated-commerce/. I’ll keep all other communication in that group from now on and the materials will be available at https://github.com/federated-commerce for anyone interesting in keeping tabs on the output. Regards, P. > On 2. Sep 2020, at 11.25, Matthias Evering <me@evering.eu> wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > I maintain a Solid Server and will join, too. > > -- > Matthias Evering > me@evering.eu > > [x]free [ ]private [ ]ask before quote > > Am 02.09.2020, 09:06 Uhr, schrieb P. J. Łaszkowicz <phil@fillip.pro>: > >> Hey all, >> >> After a lot of time spent putting practical web apps together for e-commerce projects whilst working on SOLID implementations I’ve found a lot of common ground with the use of Web ID, JSON-LD, RDF, etc., and separation of data stores. >> >> I’ve gone too far down this rabbit hole on my own and realized I’m not the only one, so I’ve proposed a complementary CG for exploring those opportunities in commerce and trading apps. >> >> For anyone interested in that same space here’s the link. >> >> https://www.w3.org/community/blog/2020/08/26/proposed-group-federated-commerce-community-group/ >> >> There should be a significant amount of commonality to make it worthwhile to keep both streams aligned conceptually, with enough domain specific ideas and needs to keep them as separate streams. >> >> If you’ve got comments or questions then please post them on the CG proposal page for transparency to the larger community. >> >> Regards, >> >> P. >
Received on Wednesday, 2 September 2020 13:04:18 UTC