Re: W3C Solid Community Group

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 11:39, Mitzi László <mitzil@inrupt.com> wrote:

> Hi W3C Solid Community Group,
>
> There have been three conversations over the email in the past couple of
> weeks:
>
>    1. Ontologies (Timo)
>    2. Identity Model (Timo)
>    3. Header to allow WebID TIS on servers (Melvin)
>
> If you would like to discuss them on the W3C Solid Community Group call
> please let me know. The agenda for the upcoming meeting is set, if we have
> time and you feel prepared we could dip into the additional conversations
> today. What would be helpful would be to define which parts of the spec are
> relevant to this conversation and where in the spec do you think additional
> work would be beneficial.?
>
> Melvin - in réponse to your question earlier, the purpose of the document
> on The Default was to demonstrate what I have in mind in preparation for an
> official conversation with our group in the upcoming call to decide how to
> move forward together.
>

Regrets for this call.

Mitzi thanks for the clarification.  Still a bit confused about the
"default" doc.  Perhaps you are able to create some kind of abstract or
longer text regarding what you'd like it to be or to become, in relation to
the group.

For example, are you trying to create a charter?  From what I saw of the
document so far, it was some subjective thoughts on what solid is.  I may
be misunderstanding tho.


>
> Mitzi
>
>