- From: Oshani Seneviratne <oshanis@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:37:26 -0400
- To: Tim Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-solid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAB00oMnqd7V4iA0DQiTU2U_jjWNa40OAeU8cD3GZrAVp7HbaiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Tim Holborn, Thank you for the email. I am very excited about the SOLID project and the community. However, unfortunately I will not have enough bandwidth to effectively chair this community group. I am however an ardent supporter of the project, and I have been and will be using the concepts from the SOLID spec in my own research. Thanks, Oshani On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:37 AM Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > Is oshani or better yet, Sandro in the room? > > Sandro would be a clear pick... > > On Tue., 30 Oct. 2018, 8:26 pm Dalton Scott, <dalton@jigsaw.xyz> wrote: > >> Hi Melvin, >> >> I would like to propose myself for chair. >> >> I am the Solid lead at Jigsaw XYZ, a London startup focused on empowering >> people to control their personal data (https://www.jigsaw.xyz/). We are >> currently exploring how Solid can be integrated with financial services. >> >> As I spend 50% of work week on Solid related projects, I could easily >> carve out some more time for this Community Group. >> >> I am also starting up a London Solid Meetup. >> >> Best, >> Dalton >> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:39 PM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 23:54, "Phil J. Łaszkowicz" <phil@fillip.pro> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> However… if Tim’s not available, happy to contribute here. >>>> >>>> My current focus is on developing an open decentralized web platform >>>> primarily written in Swift / Rust as a low-level, high performance solution >>>> intended to reduce the barrier for entry for non-technical web users, and >>>> increase discoverability for decentralized apps. >>>> >>>> I’m now working on WebID-TLS & WebID-OIDC implementations. >>>> >>>> Solid aligns well with what I’ve been doing already. >>>> >>>> I’ve not chaired before: I’ve had minor involvement in some CGs. >>>> >>> >>> Hi Phil, I'd be happy to +1 you as chair >>> >>> The advice I was given is that having two chairs normally is quite nice.. >>> >>> So I suggest we leave this open for a bit and see if anyone else has >>> interest. If it's only 1-2 people then they could simply fill the slots. >>> If there's more we could vote etc. >>> >>> Then I suggest we can propose items we'd like to explore, or work on. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 24 Oct 2018, at 22.56, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> TimBL is the obvious choice >>>> >>>> On Thu., 25 Oct. 2018, 4:39 am Melvin Carvalho, < >>>> melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> This group does not have a Chair and thus cannot publish new reports. >>>>> Learn how to choose a Chair >>>>> <https://www.w3.org/community/about/tool/#choose-chair>. >>>>> >>>>> Is on the landing page of this group. So I think we would be looking >>>>> for someone to volunteer. >>>>> >>>>> My experience of chairing a CG is that the duties are very light. You >>>>> occasionally get a message from W3C about an event - maybe once a year or >>>>> so. And you can then on top of that help out with small items of running >>>>> the group. As we are 50 members, relatively small, the amount of traffic, >>>>> should be small I would guess. >>>>> >>>>> Every CG decides a process for choosing a chair. >>>>> >>>>> But often it's just a case of whoever volunteers. Normally only 1 or >>>>> 2 people do. Or someone will step up if no one has. >>>>> >>>>> In an ideal world, more than one chair makes life a bit easier. >>>>> >>>>> So, does anyone want to chair this group. Feel free to say a few >>>>> words, if you feel like it. >>>>> >>>>> If more than one person volunteers, we can have a process, such as a >>>>> vote -- which I guess we'll have to work out! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >> Dalton Scott >> >
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2018 15:46:19 UTC