Re: Micropub test suite

We now have a client test suite for creating posts! Also the good news is
that the test suite passes itself, as demonstrated in the below video.


This is live on the micropub.rocks website now! You can read more about the
details here:

https://aaronparecki.com/2017/03/06/14/day-76-micropub-rocks-client-tests




----
Aaron Parecki
aaronparecki.com
@aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk>


On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> Apparently I wasn't paying enough attention at this point of the meeting
> last week.  Sorry for not catching this.
>
> To answer the question: I'm pretty sure we did not explicitly, with full
> consideration, agree to relax our previous plan of having complete test
> suites.  I see how that's implicit in the decision we made, and I recall
> Aaron mentioning it, so maybe everyone else thought it through, but in the
> mix of all the things going on during that meeting, I didn't put 2+2
> together.
>
> I agree we should be consistent on this.   In general, I'd say every
> constraint in the spec ought to have a few tests.   That's not a constraint
> of W3C process though -- the WG is free to set a different bar for
> interoperability and confirming implementations -- but we probably do need
> to be rational and consistent in setting that bar.
>
> So, which way do we want to go on this?
>
> And Aaron, how much of a burden would it be to finish that test suite (or
> can we recruit someone else to do it?)
>
>     -- Sandro
>
>
>
> On 03/06/2017 10:20 AM, Amy G wrote:
>
> Given the resolution about advancing Micropub to PR at the last meeting,
> did the working group decide that we don't need actually need complete test
> suites to progress to PR so long as there are reports? Does this also apply
> to LDN, WebSub and ActivityPub?
>
> On 6 March 2017 at 23:05, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote:
>
>> Correct, I have a start to the client tests but I haven't launched it on
>> the site yet. The implementation reports for clients are all self reported.
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:49 AM Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hola,
>>>
>>> Just to confirm - there are no tests for Micropub clients right? You can
>>> only test a server implementation with the current test suite?
>>>
>>> Amy
>>>
>>
>
>