Re: Review of Linked Data Notifications

On 2016-10-25 15:03, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Tuesday 25. October 2016 10.25.17 you wrote:
>> On 2016-10-19 06:59, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
>>> Dear Sarven, Amy and the rest of you,
>> There are exceptions to trying both e.g., the inbox of a non-RDFSource
>> will only be found through HTTP Link, and naturally the inbox of a
>> resource with a fragment will only be found through the body.
>
> OK! So, it was just that it was the only part of the spec I had to read
> twice before starting to hack... So, I suppose you might want to run it
> through some others to see what they infer from it.

Only twice before hacking? I think that's a success :)

Happy to improve the wording. This is after many revisions, while trying 
to keep it simple enough without having to delve into the deep, dark, 
and fun depths of RDF and HTTP.

-Sarven
http://csarven.ca/#i

Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 13:20:18 UTC