- From: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:19:02 -0500
- To: "Janina Sajka\, Chair\, Accessible Platform Architectures" <janina@rednote.net>
- Cc: "Michael Cooper\, Staff Contact\, Accessible Platform Architectures" <cooper@w3.org>, public-socialweb@w3.org
Thank you! Janina Sajka, Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures writes: > Christopher, All: > > APA has reviewed the ActivityPub specification and found no issues from > an accessibility point of view. Our activity on your document is logged > in our Spec Review Wiki at: > > https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/ActivityPub > > My apologies for our slow response to your review request. > > Janina Sajka, APA Chair > > > > Christopher Allan Webber writes: >> Christopher Allan Webber writes: >> >> > Hello, >> > >> > ActivityPub is aiming to enter Candidate Recommendation by the 11th, and >> > we'd like to request a review for any potential accessibility issues. >> > ActivityPub is a client to server (eg mobile applications, desktop >> > applications, etc) and server to server (federation) standard for >> > propagating social network activity through the web. >> > >> > In sum, ActivityPub uses ActivityStreams 2.0 as its vocabulary and >> > serialization mechanism (via json-ld), and primarily defines a mechanism >> > for discovering and submitting activities to endpoints, as well as >> > expected side effects for various activity types. >> >> And I once again forgot the link to the editor's draft. Apologies! >> >> You can find it here: >> https://w3c-social.github.io/activitypub/ >> >> > Any and all feedback is welcome. Thank you! >> > >> > - Christopher Allan Webber, >> > on behalf of ActivityPub and the Social WG
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:19:32 UTC