Fwd: AS2 issues 266, 242 and 240

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: René Peinl <rene.peinl@hof-university.de>
Date: 26 June 2016 at 15:50
Subject: AW: AS2 issues 266, 242 and 240
To: Amy G <amy@rhiaro.co.uk>


Dear Amy,

thanks for taking up on this. I was not really satisfied with the result,
but I have to consider the circumstances as well. My suggestions came late
in the process, but it was not really my fault, that I wasn’t included
earlier, since I applied for an invitation about 9 months before I was
included. Therefore, I was disappointed because of the reluctance to do
significant changes. However, it was probably my fault that I didn’t
recognize that I could have made suggestions anyway regardless of the
“invited expert” status.

Therefore I do not want to reopen these issues and hinder the
standardization process. I also didn’t had enough time to engage as much as
would have been necessary to have the right to ask for more discussion
about that.

Regards

René



*Von:* rhiaro@gmail.com [mailto:rhiaro@gmail.com] *Im Auftrag von *Amy G
*Gesendet:* Samstag, 25. Juni 2016 06:13
*An:* rene.peinl@hof-university.de; public-socialweb@w3.org
*Betreff:* AS2 issues 266, 242 and 240



Hi René,



AS2 is approaching CR, and we want to make sure all of the closed issues
were handled to the satisfaction of the commenter. You opened
https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/266,
https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/242 and
https://github.com/w3c/activitystreams/issues/240. Are you okay with the
consideration these were given, or would you like it to be reopened for
further discussion?



Issues which are requested to be reopened will be discussed during the WG
call at 1300 EST on Tuesday 28 June. If you don't respond by then, we'll
assume you are satisfied. You can respond by replying to this email or
commenting on the issue.



Thanks!



Amy