- From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:36:33 -0800
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Wilkinson <wilkie@xomb.org>, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGBSGjpFpL=JYD9zoQ5+3E4dSFUnx_BDQQQU7ssEgrA99dfg4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Fair enough. Let's add this to the agenda for Tuesday then! I would add it right now but the wiki seems to have been overrun by spammers so editing is locked while they clean it up. ---- Aaron Parecki aaronparecki.com @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > > > On 01/14/2016 02:54 PM, Aaron Parecki wrote: > > Okay thanks everyone! We're going to go with June 7-8th. I've booked the > main conference room in Portland and will arrange to have some food brought > in! I can't promise anything as fancy as Mozilla had but I'll see what I > can do! > > > Amazingly efficient as usual. > > In fairness, (1) not everyone has voted, so please re-open the poll to > give them a chance, and (2) as per the charter, it's the job of the chairs > to assess when there is consensus and schedule meetings. > > -- Sandro > > > > > > ---- > Aaron Parecki > aaronparecki.com > @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk> > > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Dave Wilkinson <wilkie@xomb.org> wrote: > >> yep. later in the week the better. I'm ok with 7+8. :) >> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Aaron Parecki < <aaron@parecki.com> >> aaron@parecki.com> wrote: >> >>> The only people on the fence seem to be James and Dave. If June 6+7 (or >>> 7+8) *can* work for both of them I would love to just settle on that >>> and move forward with plans. I know there are lots of other conflicts with >>> later dates in June already. >>> >>> James & Dave: Are one of those two pairs of dates better for either of >>> you? Personally I am leaning towards June 7+8 (Tuesday and Wednesday) but >>> would happily be convinced either way. >>> >>> ---- >>> Aaron Parecki >>> aaronparecki.com >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Sandro Hawke < <sandro@w3.org> >>> sandro@w3.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Can I suggest a new poll providing more like 15 options, and using the >>>> "if need be" advanced option? I know it's a hassle, but for this kind of >>>> multiday travel meeting, it's probably well worth the extra effort at this >>>> point. Sorry for not saying this earlier. >>>> >>>> - Sandro >>>> >>>> >>>> On January 12, 2016 3:00:52 PM EST, Dave Wilkinson < <wilkie@xomb.org> >>>> wilkie@xomb.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> that's true for me as well >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James M Snell < <jasnell@gmail.com> >>>>> jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Of the dates given, June 6 and 7 would work best but none of the dates >>>>>> are ideal. Pushing back to the following week would be best for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Aaron Parecki < <aaron@parecki.com> >>>>>> aaron@parecki.com> wrote: >>>>>> > Hi all, >>>>>> > >>>>>> > As discussed on today's call, I am happy to host the June F2F >>>>>> meeting in >>>>>> > Portland! I created a poll to collect options for dates. Please >>>>>> fill this >>>>>> > out ASAP and I will start making the arrangements! Thanks! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > <http://doodle.com/poll/5a8nfcfkqiwxwhpv> >>>>>> http://doodle.com/poll/5a8nfcfkqiwxwhpv >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ---- >>>>>> > Aaron Parecki >>>>>> > aaronparecki.com >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >> > >
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2016 21:37:05 UTC