Re: June F2F meeting in Portland

The only people on the fence seem to be James and Dave. If June 6+7 (or
7+8) *can* work for both of them I would love to just settle on that and
move forward with plans. I know there are lots of other conflicts with
later dates in June already.

James & Dave: Are one of those two pairs of dates better for either of you?
Personally I am leaning towards June 7+8 (Tuesday and Wednesday) but would
happily be convinced either way.

----
Aaron Parecki
aaronparecki.com


On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> Can I suggest a new poll providing more like 15 options, and using the "if
> need be" advanced option? I know it's a hassle, but for this kind of
> multiday travel meeting, it's probably well worth the extra effort at this
> point. Sorry for not saying this earlier.
>
> - Sandro
>
>
> On January 12, 2016 3:00:52 PM EST, Dave Wilkinson <wilkie@xomb.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> that's true for me as well
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 2:50 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Of the dates given, June 6 and 7 would work best but none of the dates
>>> are ideal. Pushing back to the following week would be best for me.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi all,
>>> >
>>> > As discussed on today's call, I am happy to host the June F2F meeting
>>> in
>>> > Portland! I created a poll to collect options for dates. Please fill
>>> this
>>> > out ASAP and I will start making the arrangements! Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > http://doodle.com/poll/5a8nfcfkqiwxwhpv
>>> >
>>> > ----
>>> > Aaron Parecki
>>> > aaronparecki.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>

Received on Wednesday, 13 January 2016 17:04:37 UTC