Re: SoLiD Update, was Re: New Scientist - We want our internet back

I'll reply on-list.
SoLiD was one of the proposals put forward for our Social API and
federation protocol deliverables. I don't think there's time at this
point to submit any part of it as one of the deliverables of the group,
but I'd like to know what its status is and what the plans are for it.
-Evan
On Mon, 2016-08-08 at 01:08 -0400, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On 08/07/2016 11:44 AM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 5 August 2016 at 21:12, Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com> wrote:
> > > I don't think we've had a SoLiD update in quite a while; is it
> > > possible to get one on the agenda for the next telecon?
> > > 
> > I asked dmitri if he'll be able to do that ... 
>  
> I asked Evan off-list, but I'll paraphrase it on list before this
> conversation goes much farther.    Basically, how is a SoLiD update
> is germane to the WG at this point?  If something doesn't shed light
> on a specific, critical-path open issue, we probably don't have time
> for it.
> 
>         -- Sandro
> 
> >  
> > > 
> > > -Evan
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 2016-08-04 at 17:25 +0200, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > This is a stack that can compete on equal footing with the
> > > > likes of facebook graph and google, and go far beyond.  I can
> > > > solve use cases unimaginable with solid that other technologies
> > > > fall over with.  
> > > > 
> > > > Perhaps the interview process in new scientist was a bit
> > > > mangled, but I think the content from what I see sounds pretty
> > > > decent.  I think the main problem here is that many people in
> > > > the WG have not seen what Solid can do.  This is where I
> > > > commend the push towards dogrooding.  I think the level of
> > > > maturity would be quite surprising to those that give it a try.
> > > -- 
> > > Evan Prodromou <evan@e14n.com>
> > > E14N
> > > 
>