- From: Sarven Capadisli <info@csarven.ca>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:48:48 -0400
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
On 2016-08-03 14:46, Sandro Hawke wrote: > But I can clarify one thing: some MIT Crosscloud-funded personnel are in > the Working Group representing Solid. At different points in time, > this has been Andrei, Sarven, and Dmitri. > > Other MIT Crosscloud-funded personnel in the Working Group are not there > on behalf of solid. That's me and Amy. It's hard to dictate > someone's technical judgments, and since neither of us happened to be > deep believers in the solid approach, it's been reasonable for us to > take on the role of staff contact, a role which requires a degree of > neutrality. (W3C doesn't ask staff contacts to give up all opinions, > because that's often at odds with having technical expertise. But we > have to balance the bigger picture.) I think the implication that the Solid representatives are not critical about the technologies that we are working with, don't have more complex viewpoints, or don't have the quality to have a degree of neutrality about technologies is unfair. I'd like to be able to characterise my 'deep beliefs' myself in future. -Sarven http://csarven.ca/#i
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2016 14:51:37 UTC