Re: Example of discussion representation from ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ on 2015-09-18 (public-socialweb@w3.org from September 2015)

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:23:01 +0200
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
CC: Renato Iannella <renato@knowledgeflux.com>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>, "Breslin, John" <john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>, "guangyuan.piao@insight-centre.org" <guangyuan.piao@insight-centre.org>
Message-ID: <55FC2C55.10501@wwelves.org>

On 09/18/2015 04:29 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> On 18 September 2015 at 14:48, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> SIOC had modeled this ages ago - why reinvent the wheel?
>>
>> http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/
> 
> 
> +1
> 
> I think there are quite a few in the WG that is unaware of SIOC and its
> uses.

John Breslin and Guangyuan Piao both represen SIOC in Social WG / IG :)
BTW IG not WG has vocabs in its charter!
http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/social-ig-charter.html#deliverables

Received on Friday, 18 September 2015 15:23:17 UTC