- From: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:09:55 -0700
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
For each of the items on next weeks agenda, here's my current disposition: +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Various Spec Cleanups and Simplifications - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/220 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "priority" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/218 (James, Ben Roberts) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "alias" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/225 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "Experience" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/226 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "Service" actor type - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/227 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Limit "duration" to ISO8601 duration strings - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/213 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove @context from all examples - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/233 (Ben) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Specify a content type on Content objects - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/229 (Michael Vogel, James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Alias `@id` and `@type` to `id` and `type` - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/232 (Manu Sporny, James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Evan joining as Co-Editor (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Oct/0214.html) Nearly all of these involve *removing* things from the core and vocabulary spec. Nothing is added. One allows the already existing `mediaType` property to appear on `Content` objects. Overall, the batch of changes above simplify the spec. +0: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Object partOf Collection - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/205 (Amy) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "hreflang" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/219 (James, Ben Roberts) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Type for object of an Offer - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/175 (Evan) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Add "Blog" Object Type - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/157 (Evan) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Separation of concerns, API vs Data Format - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/221 (Elf) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Need Blob object types? - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/223 (Elf) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remodel verbs as an rdf:Property rather than an object type - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/208 (Elf) -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Media type discussions - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/52 (Markus, Andreas Kuckartz) IMHO, these either add or change things unnecessarily or in a way that could hurt interoperability. On the issue of considering an alternative JSON serialization: -1: Social Syntax: Simplified Microformats2 JSON "jf2" (Aaron) - James
Received on Wednesday, 28 October 2015 17:10:43 UTC