- From: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:41:55 +0100
- To: "public-socialweb@w3.org" <public-socialweb@w3.org>
James M Snell wrote: > As I interpret this proposal, at this point in the process, it seems > more about "We don't agree with certain other voices in the WG so > rather than working to build real consensus, we'd much rather the > people we disagree with had lower 'priority'". > > In the meantime, I encourage anyone with more productive proposals to > submit PRs and issues against the current working drafts. With a > little bit of effort, we ought to be able to do a "final" scrub on the > existing working drafts and get them ready for Candidate > Recommendation by the time we have our face to face in December. +1 Cheers, Andreas
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 17:42:25 UTC