Re: Priority of Constituencies proposal

James M Snell wrote:
> As I interpret this proposal, at this point in the process, it seems
> more about "We don't agree with certain other voices in the WG so
> rather than working to build real consensus, we'd much rather the
> people we disagree with had lower 'priority'".
> 
> In the meantime, I encourage anyone with more productive proposals to
> submit PRs and issues against the current working drafts. With a
> little bit of effort, we ought to be able to do a "final" scrub on the
> existing working drafts and get them ready for Candidate
> Recommendation by the time we have our face to face in December.

+1

Cheers,
Andreas

Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2015 17:42:25 UTC