- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 17:19:29 +0200
- To: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Christopher Allan Webber <cwebber@dustycloud.org>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, public-socialweb <public-socialweb@w3c.org>
Consider this very realistic scenario: 1a. Linked Data agent accesses AS server 1b. it negotiates an RDF media type, and the server responds with JSON-LD 1c. the agent stores the RDF data, possibly minting new resource URIs, and re-publishes it as Linked Data 2a. another Linked Data agent accesses the re-published data 2b. it negotiates an RDF media type, and the server responds with Turtle (or RDF/XML etc.) At this point, the AS data becomes "invalid" as per the specification, even though the agents perfectly follow HTTP and RDF standards and Linked Data principles. AS breaks content negotiation by restricting the media type and disabling "the practice of making available multiple representations via the same URI". On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:00 PM, James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> wrote: > I would say that such an argument is silly, unfounded and full of hyperbole. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 7:56 AM, Martynas Jusevičius > <martynas@graphity.org> wrote: > [snip] >> >> What do you respond to the argument that restricting media type in AS >> breaks content negotiation, one of the architectural principles of the >> WWW? >> > [snip]
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 15:19:59 UTC