- From: elf Pavlik <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:13:09 +0200
- To: Kevin Marks <kevinmarks@gmail.com>
- CC: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>, Social Web Working Group <public-socialweb@w3.org>
On 10/07/2015 05:16 AM, Kevin Marks wrote: > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On 7 October 2015 at 04:01, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> wrote: >> >>> Melvin, I don't know if you actually read any of the discussion around >>> the post-type-discovery proposal, but the -1 votes were not actually >>> downvoting the algorithm's existence, they were -1s because they had >>> clarifying questions. Since this was brought up within minutes of the end >>> of the call, I'm not surprised to see the -1s. Anyway, there is now another >>> week to review the document and we will discuss it on next week's call. I >>> encourage you to join the call if you have an opinion on this. >>> >> >> Thanks for the clarification, Aaron. I dont have a problem with the >> algorithm's existence. Im sure it could be useful. It's just not REC >> track. >> >> This problem is already solved via inferencing. IMHO not a good use of >> time discussing whether or not to reinvent the wheel. Just use existing >> RECs. >> >> > Can you link me to some data that shows where this particular problem is > already solved by a REC? You can find nice illustration of reasoning over rdfs:domain here: * http://www.slideshare.net/EUCLIDproject/querying-linked-data/60 * http://www.euclid-project.eu/modules/course2 (video to accompany those slides) RDFS definition which implies an entity on which one uses property mo:member to have type mo:MusicGroup * https://github.com/motools/musicontology/blob/master/rdf/musicontology.n3#L1658-L1669 Normative definition in *W3C Recommendation* * http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_domain Major dataset using MusicOntology * http://linkedbrainz.org/
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2015 09:13:13 UTC