- From: Jason Robinson <mail@jasonrobinson.me>
- Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:28:53 +0200
- To: public-socialweb@w3.org
Hi, It seems I cannot attend this call either, even though was hoping to. Tricky time for me, due to family schedules, but hopefully will work out on some week in the future. Anyway, I'd like to quickly give a few comments on some of the items, even if this doesn't count as voting. +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Various Spec Cleanups and Simplifications - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/220 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "priority" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/218 (James, Ben Roberts) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "alias" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/225 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "Experience" - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/226 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Limit "duration" to ISO8601 duration strings - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/213 (James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Specify a content type on Content objects - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/229 (Michael Vogel, James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Alias `@id` and `@type` to `id` and `type` - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/232 (Manu Sporny, James) +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Evan joining as Co-Editor (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Oct/0214.html) +1 on all these. +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "Service" actor type - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/227 (James) As commented on github, removing "Process" instead would be nicer, but generally +1. -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Type for object of an Offer - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/175 (Evan) -1, agree with comment by James: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/175#issuecomment-119302305 -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Add "Blog" Object Type - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/157 (Evan) -1, Agreed here also to the github discussion: https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/157#issuecomment-119282356 -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remodel verbs as an rdf:Property rather than an object type - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/208 (Elf) -1 here too, it's time to move beyond remodeling the spec. -1: Social Syntax: Simplified Microformats2 JSON "jf2" (Aaron) -1 on recommending more than one vocabulary, if that is the purpose here. Implementers need to know what to implement, and giving many options in one spec doesn't give a clear picture. AS2 could be the thing and imho it should be built on. Br, Jason On 28.10.2015 19:09, James M Snell wrote: > For each of the items on next weeks agenda, here's my current disposition: > > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Various Spec Cleanups and Simplifications - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/pull/220 > (James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "priority" - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/218 > (James, Ben Roberts) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "alias" - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/225 > (James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "Experience" - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/226 > (James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "Service" actor type - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/227 > (James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Limit "duration" to ISO8601 > duration strings - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/213 > (James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove @context from all examples > - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/233 > (Ben) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Specify a content type on Content > objects - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/229 > (Michael Vogel, James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Alias `@id` and `@type` to `id` > and `type` - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/232 > (Manu Sporny, James) > +1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Evan joining as Co-Editor > (https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-socialweb/2015Oct/0214.html) > > Nearly all of these involve *removing* things from the core and > vocabulary spec. Nothing is added. One allows the already existing > `mediaType` property to appear on `Content` objects. Overall, the > batch of changes above simplify the spec. > > +0: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Object partOf Collection - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/205 > (Amy) > > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remove "hreflang" - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/219 > (James, Ben Roberts) > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Type for object of an Offer - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/175 > (Evan) > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Add "Blog" Object Type - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/157 > (Evan) > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Separation of concerns, API vs > Data Format - https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/221 > (Elf) > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Need Blob object types? - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/223 > (Elf) > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Proposal: Remodel verbs as an rdf:Property > rather than an object type - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/208 > (Elf) > -1: [Activity Streams 2.0] Media type discussions - > https://github.com/jasnell/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/issues/52 > (Markus, Andreas Kuckartz) > > IMHO, these either add or change things unnecessarily or in a way that > could hurt interoperability. > > On the issue of considering an alternative JSON serialization: > > -1: Social Syntax: Simplified Microformats2 JSON "jf2" (Aaron) > > - James > -- Br, Jason Robinson mail@jasonrobinson.me https://jasonrobinson.me
Received on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 17:29:29 UTC